30 Days from Report
Reply must be filed within 30 days of the Examination Report. Rule 36 does not provide for extension of this period.
Expert legal response to Examination Report objections. Reply filed in 3–5 working days on Form TM-M with evidence, case law and user affidavit. No government fee for the reply. 95% success-oriented handling of absolute and relative grounds.
Fill out the form to consult our IP specialists. Share your application number and Examination Report if available.
Trade Marks Registry (IP India) — sample certificate of registration
Illustrative sample. Your official certificate is issued after approval.
A trademark objection is a formal refusal raised by the Trademark Examiner in the Examination Report under Section 9 (absolute grounds) or Section 11 (relative grounds) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. It requires a reply within 30 days on Form TM-M.
When you file a trademark application (TM-A), the Examiner reviews it for compliance. If grounds for refusal are found, an Examination Report is issued detailing the specific objections (e.g. Section 9(1)(a) non-distinctiveness or Section 11(1) similarity with a prior mark). Roughly 30–40% of applications in India receive at least one objection. An objection is different from an opposition: the former comes from the Examiner before publication; the latter is filed by a third party after Journal publication.
Understanding which section applies is critical — reply strategy, evidence and case law differ entirely for each.
| Ground | Sub-section | What It Means | Reply Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-distinctive | Section 9(1)(a) | Mark lacks distinctive character | Prove acquired distinctiveness via long use |
| Descriptive | Section 9(1)(b) | Describes kind, quality, origin | User affidavit with 5+ years of sales data |
| Customary | Section 9(1)(c) | Common in trade language | Show secondary meaning through advertising |
| Deceptive | Section 9(2) | Misleads public about goods | Clarify nature, provide disclaimers |
| Functional shape | Section 9(3) | Shape dictated by function | Demonstrate non-functional design elements |
| Similarity | Section 11(1) | Similar to earlier mark in same/related class | Differentiate visually, phonetically, conceptually |
| Well-known mark | Section 11(2) | Dilutes a well-known trademark | Show no dilution, different trade channels |
| Passing off | Section 11(3) | Passing off or copyright conflict | Prove independent creation, no bad faith |
Download the report from the IP India portal. Identify every section and sub-section cited. Map each objection to the correct reply strategy (Section 9 vs 11).
Search cited marks and relevant precedents (e.g. Cadila test for deceptive similarity). Build arguments that address the Examiner’s specific grounds.
Sales invoices, advertising spend, packaging, media coverage, website screenshots and a notarised user affidavit proving date of first use and commercial presence.
Prepare a structured reply addressing each objection with legal arguments, case law citations and indexed evidence. Attach the user affidavit.
User affidavit on stamp paper, notarised. Ensure all PDFs are clear and within portal size limits. Form TM-48 if filing through an agent.
Log in, select Form TM-M, enter application number, upload reply and evidence, authenticate with DSC and submit within the 30-day deadline.
If the Examiner is not satisfied, a show-cause hearing may be fixed (government fee ₹2,500). Attend with originals or authorise a professional.
If accepted, the mark proceeds to Journal publication. If refused, consider appeal to the High Court (IPAB abolished; appeals go to jurisdictional HC).
Copy of the Examination Report identifying the exact objection grounds and sections. Mandatory for drafting the reply.
Reference for application number, filing date, class and mark representation as originally filed.
Notarised affidavit on stamp paper proving date of first use, sales, geographical presence and continuous commercial use.
Sales invoices (ideally spanning years), advertisements, packaging, website printouts, media coverage and promotional materials.
Power of Attorney authorising the agent/attorney to file and prosecute the reply on your behalf.
PAN/Aadhaar of signatory, Certificate of Incorporation / GST / Udyam as applicable for the applicant entity.
Reply must be filed within 30 days of the Examination Report. Rule 36 does not provide for extension of this period.
Failure to reply typically results in the application being treated as abandoned or refused. Re-filing means losing the original priority date.
If a show-cause hearing is scheduled under Rule 115, the government hearing fee is ₹2,500. Professional representation is recommended.
If the application is refused after reply/hearing, appeal lies to the jurisdictional High Court (IPAB abolished under the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021).
| Aspect | Objection | Opposition |
|---|---|---|
| Raised by | Trademark Examiner | Third party (any person) |
| Stage | During examination (before publication) | After publication in Trademark Journal |
| Deadline | 30 days to reply (Form TM-M) | 4 months from publication to file opposition |
| Government fee (reply/filing) | ₹0 for reply | Opposition fee applies (per class) |
| Primary grounds | Section 9 & 11 (examination) | Section 21 + same absolute/relative grounds |
| Outcome if successful | Mark accepted → Journal → Registration | Opposition withdrawn/dismissed → Registration |
If the Examiner is not satisfied with the written reply, a hearing under Rule 115 may be fixed. You will receive a notice with the date and mode (physical or virtual).
Government fee of ₹2,500 applies per hearing. Pay before or as directed in the notice.
Attend in person or authorise a trademark agent/advocate via Power of Attorney. Bring originals of key evidence and a concise oral summary of your written reply.
Examiner may accept the mark, maintain the objection, or seek further clarification. Order is reflected on the IP India portal; follow up until the status updates.
We map every ground to Section 9 or 11 and build the right defence — acquired distinctiveness for absolute grounds, differentiation for relative grounds.
Legal research and citation of relevant precedents (including the Cadila test for similarity) so the Examiner has a reasoned basis to accept the mark.
User affidavit drafting and evidence compilation (invoices, ads, packaging) indexed for a complete, professional submission.
Reply prepared and filed within 3–5 working days (subject to your documents). Registry follow-up until the status moves past “Objected”.
30 days from the date of the Examination Report. There is no provision for extension under Rule 36 of the Trade Marks Rules, 2017. Missing the deadline typically leads to refusal or abandonment of the application.
No. The reply on Form TM-M has no separate government fee. The fee was paid at the time of filing Form TM-A. If a show-cause hearing is scheduled, the hearing fee is ₹2,500.
Section 9 covers absolute grounds (the mark itself is non-distinctive, descriptive, customary, deceptive or a functional shape). Section 11 covers relative grounds (conflict with an earlier or well-known mark). Reply strategy and evidence differ for each.
Form TM-M is used to file the reply to the Examination Report (objection reply). It is filed online on the IP India portal with the written submissions and supporting evidence.
For Section 9 (absolute grounds) objections especially, a notarised user affidavit proving date of first use, sales and continuous commercial use is critical to establish acquired distinctiveness. It is strongly recommended for most replies.
The Examiner may schedule a hearing. If the application is still refused after the hearing, you can appeal to the jurisdictional High Court. IPAB has been abolished; appeals no longer go to IPAB.
An objection is raised by the Examiner during examination (before publication). An opposition is filed by a third party after the mark is published in the Trademark Journal. Different forms, deadlines and fee structures apply.
With complete documents, a professional reply can typically be prepared and filed within 3–5 working days. The 30-day statutory deadline from the Examination Report remains the outer limit.
Comprehensive support: Examination Report analysis, Section 9 & 11 strategy, Form TM-M drafting, evidence and user affidavit, online filing and follow-up. No government fee for the reply.
Get Free Consultation →